PERSONAL RISK ANALYSIS

THE CONVERGENCE OF PROTECTION MEASURES WITH SECURITY PROCEDURES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56081/2763-9940/revsusp.v1i2.a7

Keywords:

Análise de risco, segurança pessoal, proteção indivídual, análise preventiva.

Abstract

The traditional approach aimed at personal security is a set of preventive measures focused at protecting a person from potential threats. However, there is no planning as to the adequacy of the level of protection that a person requires due to an identified risk. In this context, the objective of this study is to present a risk analysis structure that allows to help, in a methodological way and with a focus on risk, the planning of the individual protection of a given individual, in order to bring suitability to the procedures in accordance with vulnerabilities and potential threats. Thus, for adequate protection, it is understood that risk analysis is a fundamental tool for planning personal safety, as it makes it possible to understand the elements that are influenced and can influence the concreteness of an unwanted event. By contemplating a risk-based study, this work proposes a methodology of Person Risk Analysis (PRA), which allows addressing the problems related to uncertainty, and assists the convergence of security procedures for a preventively balanced action, as it reduces the possibility of ineffectiveness or insufficiency of the security measures implemented by the traditional approach. It is, therefore, the modeling of a framework that processes data in an analytical way and provides systematically disciplined knowledge for evaluating and improving the effectiveness of personal protection processes.

References

ANDRADE, F. S. Análise de riscos estratégicos: proposição de uma metodologia com foco nos valores organizacionais a partir do contexto da segurança pública. 2019. 104 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia da Produção) – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, 2019. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/34550. Acesso em: 3 jun. 2021.

ANDRADE, F. S. ROCKEMBACH, Silvio Jacob. Metodologia ARSO: Análise de Riscos em Segurança Orgânica. Revista Mercopol. Edición Paraguay.[s. l.], n. 11, v. 11, 2018. ISSN 2236-9236.

ANDRADE, F. S. Análise de Riscos e a Atividade de Inteligência. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Policiais, Brasília, v.8, n. 2, p. 91-116, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31412/rbcp.v8i2.462. Disponível em: https://periodicos.pf.gov.br/index.php/RBCP/article/view/462. Acesso em: 14 ago. 2021.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. ISO GUIA 73: gestão de riscos: vocabulário. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2009.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. ISO/IEC 31010: gestão de riscos: técnicas de avaliação de riscos. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2009.

ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE NORMAS TÉCNICAS. NBR ISO 31000: gestão de riscos: diretrizes. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2018.

AVEN, T. Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research. [s. l.], v. 253, p. 1-13, 16 ago. 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221715011479. Acesso em: 14 ago. 2021.

BRASIL. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão e a Controladoria Geral da União. Instrução Normativa Conjunta MPOG e CGU nº1, de 10 de maio de 2016. Dispõe sobre controles internos, gestão de riscos e governança no âmbito do Poder Executivo federal. Brasília, DF: Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão e a Controladoria Geral da União, 10 maio 2016. Disponível em: https://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/21519355/do1-2016-05-11-instrucao-normativa-conjunta-n-1-de-10-de-maio-de-2016-21519197. Acesso em: 14 ago. 2021.

COMMITTEE OF SPONSORING ORGANIZATIONS OF THE TREADWAY

COMISSION. Enterprise Risk Management – Integrated Framework. [s. l.]: COSO, 2004.

COMMITTEE OF SPONSORING ORGANIZATIONS OF THE TREADWAY COMMISSION. The 2013 COSO framework & SOX compliance: one approach to an effective transition. [s. l.]: COSO, 2013.

COOKE, R. Experts in uncertainty: opinion and subjective probability in science. New York: Ed. Oxford University Press, 1991.

CRESWELL, J. W. Research Design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Nebraska: Ed. Sage, 2003.

FINE, W. T. Mathematical Evaluations for Controlling Hazards. Journal of Safety Research. [s. l.], v. 3, n. 4, p. 157-166, 8 mar. 1971.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARTIZATION. Risk management - Principles and guidelines. ISO 31000:2018, Geneva, 2018.

JOSHI, A.; KALE, S.; CHANDEL, S.; Pal, D. K. Likert scale: Explored and explained. British journal of applied science & technology, [s. l.], v. 7, n. 4, p. 396-403, 2015.

KOVACICH, G.; HALIBOZEK, E. P. Security metrics management. New York: Elsevier Inc, 2006.

LANDOLL, D. The security risk assessment handbook. Auerbach Publications, New York, 2006. 490 p.

MANDARINI, M. A. Segurança corporativa estratégica: fundamentos. São Paulo: Manole, 2005. 350 p.

NORMAN, T. L. Risk analysis and security countermeasure selection. CRC Press, 2010. 484 p.

PORTELLA, P. R. A. Gestão de Segurança: segurança privada, sistemas de produção, historia, metodologia e doutrina. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Rio, 2004.

REASON, J. Human error. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 320 p. Disponível em: https://www.cambridge.org/highereducation/books/human-error/281486994DE4704203A514F7B7D826C0#overview. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2021.

RENN, O. Concepts of risk: a classification. In: Social theories of risk. Westport, Conn, 1992. p. 53-79. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18419/opus-7248. Disponível em: https://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/7265. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2021.

RODRÍGUEZ, J.; CONTRERAS, B. M. G. Operational Risk: applying the Mosler methodology in production sector in Mexico. International Journal of Science and Research, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 7, p. 451-454, 2014.

SAMMUT-BONNICI, T.; GALEA, D. SWOT analysis. In: Cooper CL, ed. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, [s. l.], v. 12, p. 1-8, 2014. DOI 10.1002/9781118785317.weom120103. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118785317.weom120103. Acesso em: 14 ago. 2021.

TALEB, N.; GOLDSTEIN, G.; SPITZNAGEL, M. Seis erros que o executivo comete na gestão de riscos. [s. l.]: Harvard Business Review, out. 2009. Disponível em: https://hbr.org/2009/10/the-six-mistakes-executives-make-in-risk-management?language=pt/. Acesso em: 22 maio 2021.

UNITED KINGDOM. The Orange Book Management of Risk: principles and concepts. London: HM Treasury, 2013.

WILLIAMS, R. Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. New York: Ed. Oxford University Press, 1985.

Published

2022-12-05

How to Cite

SCARPELLI DE ANDRADE, F.; ROBERTO DOS REIS, A.; SANCHES, M. . PERSONAL RISK ANALYSIS: THE CONVERGENCE OF PROTECTION MEASURES WITH SECURITY PROCEDURES. Journal of the Unified Public Security System, Brasília, Brasil, v. 1, n. 2, 2022. DOI: 10.56081/2763-9940/revsusp.v1i2.a7. Disponível em: https://revistasusp.mj.gov.br/susp/index.php/revistasusp/article/view/63. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.